In love, what = Banged up/Damaged goods?

Nathan Thompson's picture
Posted by Nathan Thompson on December 3, 2007 10:51 AM PST
Tags: Dating
no one has voted yet
Saving...
Recommend this? YES NO

This weekend a fellow coach and I met for two hours to talk about anything and everything. I love those open ended, tangents welcome, here’s what I’m intrigued by right now conversations.

One of those tangents was the discussion of dating as a single parent, which we both have done, and what it was like to experience someone who told us “I’m not interested in dealing with all that.” We laughed as that is part of the single parent gig. And we know it is what it is.

Then our conversation progressed to what is socially thought of as banged up/damaged goods? Keep in mind banged up/damaged goods is common language that is easily understood. Obviously, individual perception is highly subjective and may or may not coincide with social norms. That said, it was interesting how we started to play the “would you be ok with this, or what if he/she had that”…game. An exploration of boundaries with regard to baggage.

What do you think?

We then progressed to coaching in relationship. My friend had an instructor who was a relationship coach that had been divorced multiple times, was single, and teaching on relationships. Naturally, our conversation went to where does that fit with regard to damaged goods. Honestly, it brings pause and then measurement. “Well, this person obviously has a lot of experience—let’s see if there is value here.”

I asked this question. In business, when an entrepreneur has two failed businesses under his or her belt, it is generally seen as a good thing--because they have experience. They know what it’s like to lose, pick themselves back up and build again. In fact, a green entrepreneur may be seen as unfit because they don’t have enough battle scars. On the contrary, in love if someone has two failed marriages and kids from multiple partners, they may be considered damaged goods.

What are your thoughts about that difference?

-NT

**Please note: This blog isn't about judgment, it’s simply a real conversation about real issues we deal with**

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to our newsletter and we'll keep you updated with fresh new content.

Great topic Nate!
What comes to mind is that both really, really depend. Let's take that entrepreneur you mentioned and examine what "failing" means. Imagine two scenarios. In one, the guy ran the business for six months, pissed off his investors, barely worked, and his employers all hate him. In another, the guy ran it for five years, made 100 million in revenue, created a game-changing technology and all his colleagues still praise his leadership abilities.

One can easily run the corollary with relationships. What were those past relationships like? What do the ex's think? how do the kids feel about the parent? It's all a question of character, which naturally shines through (but especially through one's references ;)

Richman's picture

How can someone be a relationship coach if they have not had successful relationships? This is like a fitness instructor who is out of shape. Or a career coach who is unemployed. It doesn't make sense to me. It sounds like, those who can't, teach.

Fortunes Fool's picture

This is a great topic.
I would extend the definition of relationship to relationship with oneself, your family of origin and the family of creation, your boss/business, and spirit. And then I would define success as being nourished and sustained in these relationships.
So, I'd want a coach who has a fulfilled life in all these areas regardless of marital status.

Jillian Eichel's picture